Skip to content

Practice · Cost & carbon performance

Your digital costs and your carbon emissions share the same origin

In a service business, a flow of CO2 is almost always attached to a flow of money. The structure of your emissions can therefore be derived from the structure of your costs. That is what allows us to treat both subjects together, with the same analysis and the same action plan.

Book a meeting With Nicolas Ludmann, lead partner

The situation

Two pressures, a single cause

Your cloud bill is rising faster than your business, and AI usage is accelerating the movement. At the same time, you are being asked to account for the environmental footprint of your information system.

Most organisations handle these two subjects separately: two data sets, two timetables, two action plans that never speak to each other. That is wasteful, for three reasons.

The methods are the same

Identify the drivers, measure, allocate, decide. The analytical work is rigorously identical.

The results point the same way

Reducing emissions most often amounts to reducing costs.

The environmental argument carries the financial plan

A cost-reduction exercise meets resistance that a sufficiency exercise meets far less.

Our method

The Cigref model and top-down analysis

We work from the economic and environmental IT management model published by Cigref, the French association of large-company CIOs, which structures the analysis of IT costs and their correlation with environmental impact. Top-down analysis then ranks the levers against your strategic objectives, rather than against what is easiest to measure.

Our tools connect your consumption data, your IT budget and your emissions. Where a conventional audit produces a snapshot, this approach produces a dashboard you keep using after we leave.

Three methodological innovations

Cost-to-carbon conversion by reference tables Carbon amortisation of assets Allocation to digital services

Delivered through Esiense Carbon.

Levels of engagement

Three entry points, from assessment to governance

Indicative durations. Pricing is established case by case, in a meeting.

01

Cost-carbon review 5 days

Your budget is slipping, or a reporting obligation is arriving. Collection of cost and consumption data, application of the Cigref model, top-down analysis of the drivers, identification of quick-return levers.

You leave with

  • Your cost structure and your emissions structure set side by side
  • Three to five levers costed in euros and in tonnes of CO2e
  • An estimate of the twelve-month gain

02

Optimisation plan 15 to 20 days

Detailed audit, quantification of the levers, arbitration, multi-year trajectory, integration into procurement and project governance processes.

You leave with

  • The full audit
  • A prioritised, costed action plan
  • A management dashboard
  • Environmental criteria for your tenders

03

Green PMO 6 to 24 months registered trademark

The PMO orchestrates project governance. We have extended its scope to environmental matters: sufficiency built into the management of projects, procurement and IT strategy.

You leave with

  • Governance that runs
  • A trained PMO team
  • A deliverable describing what your teams can do on their own

On regulatory pressure

We would rather tell you where you actually stand

The landscape is moving fast. Non-financial reporting obligations have been substantially reworked, and the set of companies concerned is no longer the one initially announced.

Rather than sell you an urgency that may not apply to you.

AI in this practice

AI is a line of spend and emissions like any other

Footprint of AI usage

Training, inference, corpus storage: we attach this consumption to your digital services, using the same method as the rest of your IT.

Decide before you commit

An AI use case is decided like a project: total cost, footprint, expected gain. Green PMO puts it on your governance agenda rather than in a year-end report.

Continuous measurement

Esiense Carbon turns what was measured once a year into something continuous, and tracks the real effect of the actions taken.

AI runs through all three of our practices. Our approach to AI →

Portrait of Nicolas Ludmann

Lead partner

Nicolas Ludmann

Partner, programme director

He defined the service catalogue of an international industrial group's private cloud, then took charge of its governance, its chargeback and its carbon footprint.

In a listed group, he led the reduction of infrastructure costs across an international perimeter.

On an interim management assignment, he reorganised a PMO team responsible for a portfolio of several hundred projects, then handed responsibility to an internal manager. Accredited trainer, IHEDN auditor.

Book a meeting with Nicolas Ludmann His full track record →

Track record

What we have already delivered

International industrial group

Stewardship of the governance, chargeback and carbon footprint of a private cloud deployed across the group's entities.

Insurance body, portfolio of several hundred projects

Reorganisation of a PMO team, then handover of responsibility to an internal manager.

Our clients are not named. The facts are exact. Our full track record →

Let us set your costs and emissions side by side

The partner you meet leads the engagement.

Book a meeting